Turkish Journal of Family Practice

Banner
  • Home
  • Journal Info
  • Instructions
  • Preprint Issue
  • Archive
  • Submission
  • Türkçe
Vol.22 Issue.3 · July-September 2018
Page: 104-117 Research Article 647x viewed
Previous ArticleNext Article

The evaluation of family physicians’ knowledge attitude and behaviours towards periodic examination guidelines

Share :
Published Online: 15 September 2018 · Accepted: 27 July 2018 · Received: 12 January 2018
Doi: 10.15511/tahd.18.00304
Cite Code: Turkish Journal of Family Practice 2018;22(3):104-117
Authors: Deniz Tugay Yangı 1 · Süleyman Görpelioğlu 2 · Mehmet Top 3
1 Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Training and Research Hospital, Department of Family Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
2 Department of Family Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey
3 Hacettepe University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences Department of Health Management, Ankara, Turkey
Keywords: family medicine · Health promotion · periodic health examination · periodic health examination guidelines · Primary health care
Abstract
References
PDF - The evaluation of family physicians’ knowledge attitude and behaviours towards periodic examination guidelines
Print

Although the causes of mortality and morbidity vary among countries, geographies, cultures and races, today the disease structure has been differentiated and in the 21st century the first order received noncommunicable diseases. In non-communicable disease protection primary protection is 4 times more effective than secondary and tertiary protection. The basis of primary prevention is the periodic health examinations, mainly immunization and counseling. In this context, one of the most important methods recommended for the implementation of preventive health services is periodical health examinations with standards set by various national and international organizations. Periodic health check-up is defined as regular health check-up in order to contribute to the preservation of health through healthy screening, examination and laboratory testing, counseling and health education of healthy persons who are not yet showing signs of illness. In primary prevention measures, it is emphasized that the role of service providing units is very important. With this research, it is aimed that the knowledge, attitude and behaviours of family physicians providing primary healthcare service throughout the country towards “Periodic Health and/or Physical Examinations and Healthcare Screening Guidelines Proposed in the Family Medicine Practice”, which is advisory, are defined. The questionnaire formulated on the basis of the recommended screening guide in Turkey was uploaded online on the Family Medicine Distance Learning Platform (in Tr. abbr. AHUZEM) and 20,518 registered family physicians in AHUZEM were asked to respond to the form. The family physician responded to the questionnaire on AHUEM for 23 days from 2014 to 13 February 2014 for 20 days. At the end of the study, general knowledge average of family physicians was calculated as 3,28, attitude average of 3,47 and behavior average of 2,65. In addition, it was evaluated that family physicians› knowledge concerning the periodic health examination and health screening guidelines proposed for our country is at almost medium-level and even if the level for their attitudes is higher than their knowledge level, they do not turn on the same plane into behaviour.

References

  1. Akdağ R. Sağlığın Teşviki ve Geliştirilmesi Alanındaki Değerlendirmeler: İlkeler ve Bakış Açıları. Ankara, Anıl Matbaacılık, 2010.1. Akdağ R. Sağlığın Teşviki ve Geliştirilmesi Alanındaki Değerlendirmeler: İlkeler ve Bakış Açıları. Ankara, Anıl Matbaacılık, 2010.
  2. Koruyucu Tıp ve Hekimlik. Sağlıkta Nabız Dergisi 2008. http://www.sagliktanabiz.com/haberler/koruyucu-tip-ve-hekimlik.html adresinden 10.10.2013 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
  3. Şimşek Z. Sağlığı Geliştirmenin Tarihsel Gelişimi ve Örneklerle Sağlığı Geliştirme Stratejileri. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin 2013;12(3):343-58.
  4. Holland W. Periodic Health Examination – A Brief History And Critical Assessment. Eurohealth 2009;15(4):16-20.
  5. Mazıcıoğlu M, Uzuner A. Aile Hekimliği Birinci Aşama Uyum Eğitimi Kurs Notları. Ankara, T.C Sağlık Bakanlığı Türkiye Halk Sağlığı Kurumu. 2014: 113-35.
  6. Aile Hekimliği Uygulama Yönetmeliği. 25.01.2013 tarihli Resmi Gazete, Sayı No: 28539.
  7. Wolfe RM, Sharp LK, Wang RM. Family Physician’ Opinions and Attitudes to Three Clinical Practice Guidelines. The Journal of The American Board of Family Medicine 2004;17(2):150-7.
  8. Al-Kubaisi NJ, Al-Dahnaim LA, Salama RE. Knowledge, Attitudes And Practices of Primary Health Care Physicians Towards Evidence-Based Medicine in Doha, Qatar, Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal 2010;16(11):1189-97.
  9. Helwig A, Bower D, Wolff M, Guse C. Residents Find Clinical Practice Guidelines Valuable as Educational and Clinical Tools. Family Medicine1998;30(6):431-5.
  10. Miyazaki K, Sato J, Mukohara K, Kitamura K, Saito S, Ban N. Attitudes of Japanase Primary Care Physicians Toward Publicy Endorsed Periodic Helath Examination: A Cross Sectional Survey. Asian Pasific Journal Cancer Previous 2007;8(2):258‑62.
  11. Prochazka AV, Lundahl K, Pearson W, Oboler SK, Anderson RJ. Support of Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Annual Physical Examination. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2005;165(12):1347-52.
  12. Fang E, Mittman BS, Weingarten S. Use of Clinical Practice Guidelines in Managed Care Physician Groups. Archives of Family Medicine 1996;5(9):528-34.
  13. James P, Cowan T, Graham R, Majeroni B. Family Physicians’ Attitudes About And Use of Clinical Practice Guidelines. Journal of Family Practice 1997;45(4):341-7.
  14. Hayward RS, Guyatt HG, Moore K, McKibbon A, Carter OA. Canadian Physician’ Attitudes About and Prefernces Regarding Clinical Practice Guidelines. Canadian Medical Association 1997;156(12):1715-23.
  15. Tunis SR, Hayward RS, Wilson MC, et al. Internists’ Attitudes About Clinical Practice Guidelines. Annals of Internal Medicine 1994;120(11):956-63.
  16. Lugtenberg M, Schaick MZ, Westert GP, Burgers JS. Why Don’t Physicians Adhere to Guideline Recommendations in Practice? An Analysis of Barriers Among Dutch General Practitioners. Implementation Science 2009;54:1-4.
  17. Pimlott NJ, Persaud M, Drummond N. et al. Family Physicians And Dementia In Canada Part 1. Clinical Practice Guidelines: Awareness, Attitudes, And Opinions. Canadian Famiy Physician 2009;55(5):506-7.
  18. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR. et al. Why Don’t Physicians Follow Clinical Practice Guidelines? A Framework for Improvement. Journal of the American Medical Association 1999;282(15):1458-67.
  19. Rätsep A, Kalda R, Oja I, Lember M. Family Doctors’ Knowledge And Self-Reported Care of Type 2 Diabetes Patients İn Comparison to The Clinical Practice Guideline: cross-sectional Study. Biomedcentral Family Practice 2006;7(36):1-7.
  20. García AZ. Factors Influencing Colorectal Cancer Screening Participation. Gastroenterology Research and Practice 2012. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/483417
  21. Sewitch MJ, Burtin P, Dawes M. et al. Colorectal Cancer Screening: Physicians’ Knowledge of Risk Assessment And Guidelines, Practice, and Description of Barriers And Facilitators. Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology 2006;20(11):713‑8.
  22. Viera AJ, Thorpe JM, Garrett JM. Effects of Sex, Age and Visits on Receipt of Preventive Healthcare Services: a Secondary Analysis of National Data. BMC Health Serv Res 2006;6(15):1-8.
  23. Mavriplis CA. Should we abandon the periodic health examination? Can Fam Physician 2011;57(2):159-61.
  24. Banks I, Baker P. Men and Primary Care: improving Access and Outcomes. Trends in Urology & Men’s Health 2013. doi: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/tre.357
  25. Yalçınkaya M, Gök Özer F Yavuz Karamanoğlu A. Sağlık Çalışanlarında Sağlıklı Yaşam Biçimi Davranışlarının Değerlendirilmesi. TAF Prev Med Bull 2007;6(6):409-20.
  26. Çetin FE. Ankara Halk Sağlığı Müdürlüğü ve Merkez İlçelerin Toplum Sağlığı Merkezlerinde Çalışan Sağlık Personelinin Sağlıklı Yaşam Biçimi Davranışlarının Değerlendirilmesi. Ankara, Gazi Üniversitesi, 2015.
  27. Özyazıcıoğlu N, Kılıç M, Erdem N, Yavuz C, Afacan S.Hemşirelik Öğrencilerinin Sağlıklı Yaşam Biçimi Davranış-larının Belirlenmesi. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi 2011;8(2):276-332.
  28. İlhan N, Batmaz M, Utaş Akhan LU. Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Sağlıklı Yaşam Biçimi Davranışları. Maltepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Bilim ve Sanatı Dergisi 2010;3(3):34-44.
Related Posts
THE UTILIZATION AND SATISFACTION STATUS OF INDIVIDUALS ATTENDING PRIMARY HEALTH CARE CENTERS IN KAYSERI
Some tips for family physicians about malpractice
Family medicine residents: their features and differences
Approach to eating disorders
  • Facebook

    1,274 Likes

  • Twitter

    455 Followers

Kapak Picture

Your Opinions are Important to Us!

We are waiting for your valuable opinions and contributions... Write To Us
Open Access
Our journal promotes the development of global open access to scientific information and research...
Banner Image
Aile Hekimliği Logo

e-ISSN: 1308-531X
Editor-in-Chief
Prof. Dr. Esra Saatçi


Official Journal of the Turkish Family Physicians Association. Published by Medikal Akademi, Istanbul. Copyright © 2014, TAHUD.

Copyright Logo

Except where otherwise noted, academic content of this online version of the journal is licensed by Medikal Akademi and TAHUD under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution-NoCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-ND3.0) License.

© Copyright 2021 - Turkish Journal of Family Practice - Tasarım ve Uygulama KarmaVA & Medikal Akademi
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Join our Facebook Group
  • Subscribe to our RSS Feed